rant #310805

last night i watched for a while the ABC tv programme of special report by kerry o'brien. the topic that came out first was the subject around the line of creation vs. evolution, a much debated one. but so far as we know, evolution is a much popular idea that science had been proposing, and to a larger extend, this theory is widely taught in schools to unlock the mystery of life, formed as a result of natural selections, but never created.

however, the complexity of life rules out this theory of evolution, as some have come to term with and mostly excluding those from the background of science, simply because there is never an explanation in how precisely designed for their right purposes things are, taking as an example the mechanism of human's eye-balls whose functions are copied by the design of a camera.

so now, the 'trend' that has taken place in america, and even endorsed by their president (and i have no idea how much territory a religion has been invaded by the political 'comrades', but it's sure to play an important distinction there whether someone is a religious right or liberal left :), is that creation is now taught alongside evolution in schools to fill in the gap that science can't never explain regarding the complexity of things/life. yet still there may be more scientists who'd disagree to this approach because effectively it undermines science capacity to advance, simply put, science and supernatural power don't mix. precisely the case, those who disagree are reluctant in identifying the 'force' or 'subject' behind the supernatural.

in australia, this issue was given a conditional "yes" by the federal (or ? state) minister of education, brendan nelson, giving the permission that if parents allow, creation will be taught alongside evolution, but never will it be a case that science will be over-shadowed or put obsolete by the so-called supernatural point of view by any means.

you will find this a popular search from the christianity point of view on this subject: Unlocking the Mystery of Life: The Case for Intelligent Design